منابع مشابه
Putnam's Paradox: Metaphysical Realism Revamped and Evaded*
Hilary Putnam's argument against metaphysical realism (commonly referred to as the "model theoretic argument") has now enjoyed two decades of discussion. 1 The text is rich and contains variously construable arguments against variously construed philosophical positions. David Lewis isolated one argument and called it "Putnam's Paradox".2 That argument is clear and concise; so is the paradoxical...
متن کاملHume, the Bad Paradox and Value Realism
One plausible interpretation of Hume’s famous claim that “reason is, and ought to be, the slave of the passions” holds that desires are necessary to motivation, that beliefs alone cannot motivate. Now some have held, against Hume, that there are in fact beliefs which could motivate all by themselves—namely, beliefs about what is good. For there to be such beliefs then cognitivism about value—th...
متن کاملThe Paradox of Knowability and Semantic Anti-Realism
ing away from its implications for knowledge and knowability, at least to begin with. He thinks that once this is done, Fitch’s result is only initially surprising; for it is clear that the result is derived simply because truth-entailing operators can be used to construct self-refuting expressions. Mackie gives the following example to illustrate this: Let J be an operator variable that has an...
متن کاملParadox and Relativism
Since the time of Plato, relativism has been attacked as a self-refuting theory. Today, there are two basic kinds of argument that are used to show that global relativism is logically incoherent: first, a direct descendent of the argument Plato uses against Protagoras, called the peritrope; and, second, a more recent argument that relativism leads to an infinite regress. Although some relativis...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
سال: 2000
ISSN: 0029-4527
DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1038336843